
Motorbuys | Local Jobs |
Homes |
Rental Property |
Coupons |
Garage Sales|
Classifieds | Worship | ShopNow
|
September 8, 2008, 12:29 am
|
Advertising |
Welcome to the new Savagepacer.com, the home page of the Savage Pacer newspaper. Let us know what you think of the changes to the site.
Got a news tip? Email us, or call us at (952) 440-1234
|
Search |
User loginAdvertisingEmail Edition
Type in your email address and click "Subscribe" to receive our E-mail Edition in your inbox.
|
Fate of rare forest debated by City Council
June 15, 2007 - 11:41am — Nancy Huddleston
By Nancy Huddleston, editor What’s more important – a rare wooded area or making way for development? That potentially explosive question was explored Monday night (June 11) by the Savage City Council in regard to SS-9, a wooded area that was preserved as part of the Prior Lake High School site development, but might be removed as Prior Lake Aggregates’ plans to develop its gravel pit into housing moves forward. The Maple Basswood forest covers about 7 acres and is a hardwood forest that includes a mix of oak, maple, elm and ash trees. There are 1,000 estimated trees in the area and the natural community is rated as “exceptional” because it has not been disturbed. SS-9 was identified in a natural resources survey done in 2001 by the city and is only one of two of its kind in Savage and one of 105 in the seven-county metro area. It is the only natural area with an “exceptional” rating in the city. When an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was done of the high school site, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) expressed concern that SS-9 could be degraded or even eliminated. The Metropolitan Council also commented that any native forests on the high school site should be saved as much as possible, particularly the highest quality areas. Natural Resources Specialist Jon Allen told the City Council that its conversation about removing SS-9 is “short sighted in terms of considering the loss of trees for the purpose of not having to construct a retaining wall and providing extra parking. You’re missing out on the importance of SS-9. “In this case, the area has been identified as the most significant of all areas of Savage,” he continued. “You’re talking about an eco system that functions at a high level. It has biological diversity that we don’t find anywhere else.” Mayor Tom Brennan acknowledged the rareness of SS-9, but said “no one can use it, feel it.” The mayor went on to say SS-9 is like the Savage Fen Wetland Complex, noting it’s a resource that is not usable by the general public. “People want to see and use their natural resources,” he said. Councilman Al McColl said another aspect of preserving SS-9 is the need to build a 70-foot retaining wall on school grounds, which, to him, poses a safety problem. “If I was still a high school kid, I’d want to try and climb it,” he said. Councilwoman Janet Williams suggested that if SS-9 must be removed, then the tree replacement that would be required could be spread out all over the community and enjoyed for years to come by more residents. “That way we’d be putting trees where people could enjoy them,” she said. Achieving balance City Administrator Barry Stock said the discussion about SS-9 is all about balance. “This is a tough decision because it includes the desire to preserve open space and natural resources; but, on the other side, equal weight could be given to safety, traffic needs and providing more athletic fields,” he said. In fact, if he were to write out a list of “pros” and “cons” regarding SS-9, he guessed the lists would be even. “So where’s the balance?” he asked. “People say they want open space, but they also want better transportation, to be safe and to have places where their kids can play ball. So it’s hard to look at preserving that area when you weigh in all the other things.” The reason the City Council is discussing the topic is that Prior Lake Aggregates is getting ready to renew its mining permit. As part of that process this year, the company needs to set forth an end-use plan for the gravel pit site. An AUAR (Alternative Urban Areawide Review) and mitigation plan for the gravel pit was completed last year and will be included in this year’s mining permit application. As part of the AUAR process, a lot of time was spent regarding the gravel pit’s proximity to the high school site and how development of the mining area into a residential area would be achieved. There is a 70-foot drop between the gravel pit property and high school site. Preserving SS-9 would require building a high retaining wall and limit the options for constructing a road from the gravel pit site to the high school site. Removal of SS-9 would involve cutting down the hillside, grading the area so that the school district could install two more ball fields and would provide a smoother grade transition between the sites. Furthermore, a road could be built through the area that would provide an alternative route to county roads 27 and 44. What’s even trickier is that SS-9 is on school district property. According to representatives of Prior Lake Aggregates, they have had discussions with Prior Lake-Savage Area School District officials about SS-9. Stock said the owner of the gravel pit is looking for direction from the city and school district about what to do in this area in regard to the overall end-use plan. “They would like to move forward to complete this part of their plan.” At this week’s meeting, Prior Lake Aggregates Attorney Gerry Duffy said the significant grade difference in the area is what’s driving this discussion. “We need to make that area more usable,” he said. Although the City Council made no decision on SS-9, when the mayor asked for consensus for moving forward with removal of the area, there were nods all around the table. Councilman Gene Abbott was absent from the meeting. Stock said the next step is for Prior Lake Aggregates to continue discussions with District 719 and for the city to keep reviewing the options. “There are no easy answers here,” he stressed. Nancy Huddleston can be reached at editor@savagepacer.com. What do you think? Should the city preserve SS-9 or allow it to be eliminated to make way for development. Go to www.savagepacer.com/node/3060 to sound off in the forum.
|
Advertising |
I personally will not be...
Back to page topI personally will not be voting for any member that chooses development over preserving this resource. When the school site was developed, the adjacent woodland was described as a resource that would be used by the school to teach the importance of preserving our natural resources and the forest would prove to be a valuable teaching tool. The school district understood that this land would not be developed. If the school district needs more fields, let them build a second high school. The last thing that we need is another mega high school more devoted to athletics than education.
One council member stated if he was still in high school he would jump off the steep embankment needed to preserve the forest. Lets just hope that our children have a lot more common sense then him. If there are any water tower garfetti cases open from forty years ago, I think we have a suspect.
Terry O'Connell
I personally will not be...
Back to page topI personally will not be voting for any member that chooses development over preserving this resource. When the school site was developed, the adjacent woodland was described as a resource that would be used by the school to teach the importance of preserving our natural resources and the forest would prove to be a valuable teaching tool. The school district understood that this land would not be developed. If the school district needs more fields, let them build a second high school. The last thing that we need is another mega high school more devoted to athletics than education.
One council member stated if he was still in high school he would jump off the steep embankment needed to preserve the forest. Lets just hope that our children have a lot more common sense then him. If there are any water tower garfetti cases open from forty years ago, I think we have a suspect.
Terry O'Connell
I'm furious with the...
Back to page topI'm furious with the attitude that everything must be developed or used. We need wild places too. Everyday I watch kids hanging over the railroad bridges, but I never see anyone having a fit about that. And the idea that planting new trees could ever replace clear cutting old growth trees! Just like the new developement proposed east of Lynn...a developer buys the property as rural, and then wants it rezoned. Leave some woods for people to just enjoy.
In my opinion, this is...
Back to page topIn my opinion, this is another statement from our politicians that do not have a clue what is best for its inhabitants. What can change in six short years. If a forest area is rated excellent, why change that? There was a reason it was preserved during previous development, keep the same.
I am no tree hugger, but...
Back to page topI am no tree hugger, but this forest needs to stay.
We are developing far too much land in the south metro. It's beutiful land too.
It's seven wooded acres...
Back to page topIt's seven wooded acres behind a school, why can't people stick with the original plan and use it for education? I guess a few thousand feet of chain link fence for some ballfields that get used 2 months per year are far more valuable than a small remaining oasis of nature in the sprawling pavement blob of the burbs.
As Mayor Tom Brennan said...
Back to page topAs Mayor Tom Brennan said "no one can feel it, use it" Does that mean we can destroy it with a clear conscience? No! The next time your at the Minnesota Zoo look for the sign at the beginning of one of their exhibits that says we are destroying 27,000 species of animals and plants a year! Why should we let this go on in our neck of the woods? Scientists say "this can never be recreated", Christians would say "We can't continue to destroy the beauty of God's creation!" Parents would say "What kind of world will our children have if we continue like this?"
Is Prior Lake Agg. having...
Back to page topIs Prior Lake Agg. having undue influence with the counsel and Mayor Brennan on this issue? Prior Lake Agg. could easily stand to make a lot more money if they get us to build ball fields near their land, as they plan on selling it to home developers. Then the home developers won't feel the pressure to include their own park in their development, and thus probably save thousands. I can't help but think, when the ethical side is being so easily ignored, that foul things are going on behind the scenes.
I can't help but be...
Back to page topI can't help but be suspicious of the "safety concern" Al McColl brings up in this article. Why couldn't a 70 foot drop be graded to a safe slope? They have 7 ACRES, this should easily be enough room. Am I the only one whose intelligence is offended by this 'safety' comment?
This is ridiculous. "People...
Back to page topThis is ridiculous. "People want open space, but they also want better transportation, to be safe and to have a place where there kids can play ball."
Who are these "people?" Are they unaware of the numerous other parks and ball fields the city has already provided in nearly every neighborhood in Savage and Prior Lake?
I don't need to roll around on the ground or "use" this area to appreciate it. Can't it just be left alone?
Because of the school district boundaries, my child will probably never attend Prior Lake High School, though we reside in Savage. We moved here two years ago to escape the "open spaces," to have trees and undeveloped landscape. Every city I have ever lived in has been decimated due to progress.
And is it supposed to pacify me to know that the city plans to replant trees throughout the area once they plow down 7 acres of land? It doesn't. I am allowed to enjoy random trees newly installed in city parks, brand new housing developments, and public buildings, but I am not allowed to enjoy 7 acres of thriving ecosystem?
The baseball team gets to enjoy two new ball fields and the kids learning earth sciences and biology get to study a 70 foot retaining wall and a bunch of gravel! What are the priorities here?